Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks

It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. It is evident that not all will appreciate the decision that the Supreme Court has chosen to go for. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.

It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. Even without taking into account the challenges in the prevailing campaign finance laws, the Supreme Court chose to go with it. As such, no corporate will be free to donate their money to campaigns or even candidates. This is what has brought about the checking of the role of corporations in matters to do with politics. You will find that in previous instances, corporates has the room to donate to campaign kitties from time to time. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. The aim of this case was to make sure that a boost in financial responsibility and even economic opportunities is enriched. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.

You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. You will note that these companies intimated that the first amendment rights of companies was being overlooked. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also appealed to the constitution which indicates the need to equally protect each individual. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This in itself shows that corporate entities are receiving preferential treatment. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.

It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling was actually against corporates being allowed to contribute to political campaigns. This is due to the fact that they can spiral to corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.